Artificial intelligence, the United States is considering the Artificial Intelligence Rights Act

last yearOffice of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) from the government United State He declared that the country needed a bill of rights in the age of algorithms. As the American version effectively says wiredSince the damage caused by artificial intelligence (AI) mainly affects marginalized communities, it is imperative that government steps in to protect people from to discriminatory or ineffective. On October 4, OSTP published a draft file Law of Rights on Artificial Intelligenceafter collecting contributions from companies such as Microsoft and Palantir, de Startups that monitor AI review systemsand human rights and citizenship groups. The Five principles The document that makes up the document asserts that individuals have the right to control how their data is used, to choose not to be subject to automated decisions, not to suffer the effects of ineffective or unsafe algorithms, to know when AI makes a decision that affects them and not to be discriminated against.

“Technologies come and go, while freedoms, rights, opportunities and access must be ensured, and it is the duty of the government to help make this happen. – Explains Wired US Alondra Nelson, OTP Vice President for Science and Society -. This is the White House saying to workers, students, consumers, communities, and everyone in this country We expect and expect the best from our technology“.

Project scope and boundaries

However, unlike the well-known United States Bill of Rights, which includes the first ten amendments to the US Constitution, this version of artificial intelligence will not have the force of law: it is, in fact non-binding document. The White House AI Rights Project is primarily aimed at the federal government. The way algorithms are used is set to change only if they can guide government agencies in acquiring and using AI technology, or if they help parents, workers, politicians, or designers ask difficult questions about To the. the paper It has no effect on the big tech companieswho are arguably the most powerful when it comes to shaping the proliferation of machine learning and artificial intelligence technologies.

The document notes closely the myriad of ethical principles related to artificial intelligence that have been proliferated in recent years by corporations, nonprofits, and democratic governments. Even by the Catholic Church. These values ​​usually go in the right direction, and words like TransparencyAnd the explicability And the reliability, but it lacks content and is too vague to make a difference in people’s daily lives. Nelson points out that the AI ​​rights bill differs from the AI ​​principles of the past in that The document is supposed to be put into action immediately. “We also know that we believe that principles are not enoughI – acknowledges Nelson -. But This is just progress. It’s just the beginning, the starting point”.