The UK shuts down with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): which means privacy in the West

The UK government wants to distance itself, Certainly, from the European Privacy Regulation, from barbs. A stumbling block on the path towards shared values ​​at the Western level is about how to manage personal data in the digital economy.

The UK is moving away from the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)

Government of the new Prime Minister Liz Gears In fact, it was announced a few days ago that the data reform project introduced in recent months is awaiting a new examination by the ministers.

The bill in question contained a package of amendments to the UK’s data protection regime, which is still based on GDP despite Brexit.

The amendments changed the rules for the processing of personal data in areas such as consent to online tracking, scientific research data, and the use and sharing of public sector data. The goal was to relax some rules for small businesses while saving more than £1 billion over ten years.

“At the moment when the UK’s repeatedly stated farewell to the regime of freedom of movement and data protection that the EU has set up with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) must come to pass, we can say that Brexit will be accomplished and the UK will finally be out of the treasury. In the sincerity of his intentions,” Rocco comments PanettaPrivacy Advocate.

The new announcement by the new Secretary of State for Digital Affairs, Michelle Donelan, has caused quite a stir: The reform “will replace the GDPR.” In its place, “Our Data Protection Regulation for UK Business and Consumer”.

This new reform approach requires the government to target the EU “bureaucracy” which, according to Donelan, is responsible for the fact that current British rules place a disproportionate burden on small businesses due to the EU’s “one-size-fits-all” approach.

He also noted that “simplifying” the UK’s data protection system would help launch economic growth by increasing corporate profits.

In short, the new plan requires the UK to create its own ‘really tailored’ privacy rules Rather than maintaining existing data that favors trade with the EU by allowing people’s data to flow freely from the EU to the UK.

“Our plan will protect consumers’ privacy and keep their data secure, while maintaining the adequacy of our data so businesses can trade freely,” he said. “I can promise you here today that it will be simpler and clearer for businesses: our business will not be hampered by unnecessary bureaucracy.”

Donilan cited a working document written by researchers at Oxford University, according to which the GDPR “limits” corporate profits by 8%.

Of course, the research paper from January 2022 that referred to the 8% drop in earnings describes it as a Appreciationcalls itself a “work in progress” and advises caution when interpreting its results, arguing, for example, that the negative business performance impacts the document links to GDPR “could partly reflect temporary compliance costs, meaning their effects could be diminished.” In the future “.

The Big Picture: Shared Privacy in the West?

Applause to Donelan of the Conservative Party.

It is not clear how the new law will work.

It is possible to imagine that this could harm the free circulation of data between Europe and the United Kingdom, where the laws may not be compliant.

In general, the new government’s move appears to be going in the opposite direction to the prevailing winds now, the one in which it is moving

• Europe is rapidly passing strict new data laws, see Digital Services Law Which received final approval this week and is now awaiting publication in the European Journal only
• The United States is slowly taking steps toward its first federal privacy law and is on the verge of agreeing to a new transatlantic agreement on the trading of European-American data as an alternative. From Privacy Shield (broken).

Privacy in the United States, where are the first national rules

It is not clear how “heavy” the British Conservative government’s move will be. There are two opposing ways of looking at it.

• It’s a statement that will leave time to find it, in a government already strongly contested, in its infancy; The United States, with Joe Biden, shows that we are moving toward a common idea of ​​privacy and data sharing in the Western bloc.
• Alternatively, this may be the first squeak of this popular privacy design. Much will depend not only and not so much on what happens to the British government but on the nature of the new agreement between the United States and Europe, and on when it will be implemented (to see if Biden’s proposal moves immediately to Europe). Remember, midterm elections are pending in the United States where Republicans are almost certain to bolster, and in a couple of years the specter of Donald Trump will appear in force, on the idea of ​​a Western blockade unit for privacy.

“The UK has always been critical and very curious to other EU countries regarding data usage legislation, even when it was a full member of the union. At all work tables the UK has always told a different story about privacy, with a nod to the US and those who supported it. Always a world based on the commodification of personal data and on the marginalization of the role of guarantors,” he says. Panetta..

“Now he explicitly declares that he wants to simplify corporate lives, forgetting that the GDPR is the standard that has put responsibility, so-called accountability, for those who process data at the center.”

“We will see if the UK will succeed in its attempt to rebalance the markets of a particular economy in its favour, or if it will be another target of its own, as the UK has recently been used to us watching,” Panetta adds.

The West needs a coordinated privacy framework to protect collective interests and economic growth. Could the UK go in a different direction?

Rossella confirmed that the match is open Boca From the law firm Previti: “If it is true that Great Britain wants to build a bridge over the Atlantic and act as ‘the data center of the world’, it will have to be careful in assembling the new rules, so as not to wink too much at the United States with the risk of losing elements in the decision of convenience with the Union” .

“In this case, in fact, the British government’s intent to facilitate corporate competitiveness and protect consumers could be a very dangerous throwback.”

@All rights reserved