Catanzaro – As is the case every year, admission to the Medicine and Surgery course is marked by many controversies and irregularities. This year it was the turn of the young Lamitina student who canceled the exam by the University of Catanzaro after participating in the entrance exam for medicine and surgery. According to what had been learned, the young candidate at the end of the selective examinations had mistakenly inserted the answer form into the different container used to hold the personal data sheets. When the polls opened, “The University—a note reads—instead of regulating the candidate’s position by sending to CINECA the task done for correction, has canceled her examination, thus permanently excluding her from the individual national rankings.” Although solid special law From the notification of the competition, and despite the error made, albeit innocent, the candidate, who considers herself harmed by the illegality of the administrative procedure, lodged an appeal with lawyer Laura Gualberto of the Court of Lamezia Terme, requesting correction of the assignment and inclusion in the individual national ranking based on the degree due.
The Lazio Regional Administrative Court with an immediate preventive ruling accepted the lawyer’s requests in full. In Saving, Lazio Tar,”Considering that this error is of a purely formal nature and did not result in harm to other competitorsThe cancellation of the applicant’s trial was deemed disproportionate to the event. In essence, the present case: “It poses no great problem of violating the principles of anonymity and confidentiality of examination, which were set up for the supervision of public competitions, in order to ensure equality of treatment among candidates.” Attorney Laura Gualberto stresses “the importance of the decision issued, which in the face of the candidate’s violation of the rules, the harm to the effective public interest is in no way recognizable, and the preference must be approved.” Kindly share, with the consequent relaxation of the private rule of advertising in the face of innocent error. Therefore, the University will now have to proceed with suspending the disputed proceedings, and with correcting the applicant’s examination, as well as including him in the national rankings, within the specified deadlines, to avoid having to compensate a candidate for all damages sustained and incurred by him due to the wrongful actions taken Instead, additional profiles for legality and bias will be duly assessed at the hearing on the merits scheduled for April 2023.
“Food expert. Unapologetic bacon maven. Beer enthusiast. Pop cultureaholic. General travel scholar. Total internet buff.”